| Hello, 
      I must say I'm a little disappointed not to have received a reply
      for this mail from the 5th Feb - forwarded below. 
      I saw from my mailserver that it had been received by your email
      system at the time of sending. 
      In case the pdf/jpg attachments caused reception issues, I have
      packaged them up and they are available here:
      
https://www.dropbox.com/s/704bgqwc1z542of/20140215-ES1910AR-Meacher-EverestWindows.zip 
      This contains: 
      * The proposed design for the small windows I was sent 3rd
        October 2013  and as such what I'd expected. 
      * A comparison of the original design, what I was expecting and
      what was actually (wrongly) produced. 
      * The four scale drawings of what they should be, as pdf files. 
      * Image from across the road showing original and replacement
      windows with the same design .
       
      I've today spotted that the house at #81 across the road has a
      mixture of old & new (replacement casement) windows, both of
      which have the same design as mine, even though the panels are
      different sizes and shapes. This I have included a picture of in
      the zip file referred to above. 
      Therefore, the fact that Everest (being the second largest home
      improvements company in the country) have been unable to achieve
      this, does seem quite bizarre.
       
      I really hadn't expected this project to take so long and would
      like to point out it has delayed my other refurbishment plans
        by getting on for six months . 
      Therefore I am willing to give you the opportunity to resolve this
      farce to my satisfaction, although this can only be until I have
      found an alternative supplier, at which point we would have to
      consider this order cancelled.
       
      Regards, 
      Sean Meacher
       
      On 05/02/14 20:20, sean@xxxxxxxxxxx  wrote:
    
      
      
      
        Hello Mr Lees, I see what has happened here.Iâve put together an image titledÂâone of these is not like
          the othersâ, which will show you what the differences are.
 Basically, theÂâscaled drawingâ that may have been supplied to
          CET, doesnât look like the design I sent you previously and
          gave Robbie a copy of (as an acetate printout) in December.
 Somewhere along the line, it has beenÂcropped, not scaled.
 Iâm sure the difference will be immediately apparent to you.
 
 Iâve also attached here scale drawings of what I expected
          them to look like - where the design is the same, accounting
          for the difference in panel sizes.Itâs not a difficult change - these took me about half an
          hour.
 These are for the 4 panel sizes that I was originally given
          around 3rd October.
 Iâve confirmed with CET that the edge sizes are fine. So for
          that Iâm happy.
 Unless you need different panel sizes, feel free to have them
          processed appropriately.
 However I would like confirmation of what is being produced to
          save wasting more time, effort and materials.
 Then when theyâre finished, pictures as you kindly provided
          previously, so Iâm not surprised if/when they eventually turn
          up at my house.
 
 
          When I received the mail last Friday, I will admit I took a
            couple of days to calm down from the feeling of shouting at
            a mindless unstoppable behemoth.
 Iâm happy to deal with you directly as you have shown me
            that you can be helpful.
 I would however still like answers to my other queries from
            the 2nd Feb.
 
 Regards,
 Sean Meacher
 
 Sent from Windows Mail 
 
 
          Dear Mr Meacher,
          
          
          
          I sent you an email on the 21
            Jan asking
            you if you had looked at our website and also if my reply to
            your email
            was OK.
          
          
          On the 23 Jan I sent you
            actual pictures
            of the units in your windows. You replied on the 29 Jan some
            6 days later
            after we emailed you. ÂYour email was not clear. These are
            the scaled
            drawings that were supplied to CET. I need to know what you
            are not happy
            with. I would appreciate a constructive reply. I would like
            myself and
            the surveyor to visit you to find out why you are not happy
            with these
            designs. 
          
          
          The offer of visiting me to
            see your
            actual windows still remain. Your windows are being
            delivered Wednesday.
          
          
          Given that the smaller window design appears
              to have
              been somewhat truncated the answer will have to be 'no'.At some future time I would imagine that will be
              corrected, however that
              time is not now.
          
          
          We can work together and get
            these designs
            sorted as quickly as possible, or we can play ping pong on
            emails to prolong
            this simply task. I like you want to move forward.
          
          
          Kind regards
 
 ![]() I can't help feeling that we've been here
            several times
            before and are in fact going around in circles. Analogous to me describing to you a racehorse and getting
            back from you
            an elephant.
 So I do have to say that I've completely lost faith in your
            process.
 If unit 'B' doesn't look like supplied design 'A', shouldn't
            someone be
            checking that and confirming with the customer BEFORE
            manufacture??
 In fact the only part of this project that has gone right so
            far has been
            when I corresponded with CET directly (which both of us were
            happy about).
 What exactly do you hope to achieve by sending Robbie out
            again?.. given
            that we're still essentially in the same position that we
            have been since
            early October - 4 Months!
 
 From the original designs I was sent back (dated 3rd October
            2013), there
            were 4 sizes of panel:
 379x234mm
 393x234mm
 405x234mm
 419x234mm
 
 This means, for them to not be 'lost in translation' again,
            I have produced
            scale drawings of this remarkably simple glass design and
            send them to
            the appropriate people.
 If/When those have, as before, been deemed suitable for
            production and
            confirmed, as was the large design (which having finally now
            seen a picture
            of, I'm very happy with!), then hopefully we will be able to
            proceed -
            then I'll send you copies also.
 
 In my day job, I'm used to dealing with international
            projects that can
            affect upwards from 2000 people.
 Dealing with home improvements on this scale shouldn't be
            this tortuous!
 Should we continue with this, I would also expect some kind
            of reduction
            in the cost, given that I appear to be doing your jobs for
            you.
 Please don't get this wrong again or I shall have to find
            somewhere more
            competent.
 
 Regards,
 Sean Meacher
 
 
 
 On 30/01/14 10:06, Robyn.Drury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
            wrote:
 Hi Mr Meacher,
 
 Ken Lee's has asked me to make an appointment for Robbie
            Yapp to come see
            you to discuss the window query.
 
 I can Âoffer you an early morning appointment again from
            Tuesday
            4th Feb onwards?
 
 Could you let me know a day that would be suitable to you?
 
 Kind regards,
 
 
 ![]()  
 
 |